Practical

Can a photo give away where an abandoned place is?

Published by Urbex Legends on

A photo may contain sensitive data, including GPS location. Remove it before uploading and check the metadata in the copy to be shared. Do not rely on hiding it from view alone.

Operating systems, galleries and platforms can change their behaviour. Follow your tool’s guidance and check the copy to be shared, even after disabling location or removing metadata.

What is EXIF metadata?

A block of metadata written inside the image file at the moment of capture. It travels with the file, it appears nowhere on screen, and it survives a copy, an upload and an email attachment.

The format is publicly specified by CIPA and JEITA. The cited Exif 3.1 specification is dated 30 January 2026. A device can also use an earlier edition or manufacturer-specific fields.

A device commonly writes the camera or phone model, the lens, the aperture, the shutter speed, the ISO, the date and the time. And, when it knows where it is, a dedicated block.

Does a phone photo really contain my location?

A photo may contain location data when the camera uses location services. GPS fields can appear in the GPS Info IFD, identified by tag 0x8825. Inspect the file: a location permission alone does not establish what was saved.

Here is what it holds, as the Exif tag table defines it:

Tag What it records
GPSLatitudeRef then GPSLatitude North or South, then latitude in degrees, minutes and seconds
GPSLongitudeRef then GPSLongitude East or West, then longitude, same format
GPSAltitudeRef then GPSAltitude Altitude in metres, above or below the reference level
GPSTimeStamp and GPSDateStamp Time in UTC, and the date as YYYY:MM:DD
GPSImgDirection Direction the camera faced, from 0.00 to 359.99 degrees

A latitude and a longitude in degrees, minutes and seconds do not describe a town. They describe a point. And GPSImgDirection finishes the job by recording which way the lens was pointing.

EXIF is not the only carrier either. XMP and IPTC, which editing software writes readily, hold location fields of their own. A file can be clean on the EXIF side and talkative somewhere else.

How do you check what a photo carries?

The check takes thirty seconds, and it is the one step in this guide that nobody can do for you.

  1. On Windows, inspect the fields shown in Properties → Details. This view is not an inventory of every metadata format.
  2. With ExifTool, exiftool -a -G1 -s my-photo.jpg displays recognised metadata and its groups. The tool supports EXIF, GPS, IPTC and XMP, among others.
  3. Check the copy actually shared, after any export or resizing, not only the original.

Depending on the software and settings, an export can retain or remove metadata. The visible image does not tell you which happened.

How do you strip metadata before publishing?

Four documented methods, and what each one leaves behind. The right-hand column is the one missing everywhere else.

Method Action Limit to check
ExifTool on a JPEG copy: exiftool -all= my-photo.jpg Requests deletion of removable metadata Deletion depends on the format and does not guarantee that all information is gone. The _original file kept by default still contains the original data. Check the output copy and do not share that backup.
iPhone: Share → Options → turn Location off Excludes location from that share Does not universally clean files kept in the photo library.
Windows: Properties → Details → Remove Properties and Personal Information Removes supported properties, preferably on a copy Check the copy with a metadata reader; this does not remove visible clues in the picture.
Google Photos: remove an estimated or manually added location Changes the location managed in Photos Does not remove location written by the camera; a download shared outside Photos can retain the original location.

Two things follow from that table.

The backup copy is the trap people fall into. ExifTool preserves the original by appending _original to the filename. That file still holds the coordinate. Zip the folder, send the folder, and the work is undone.

The most reliable move happens upstream. Turning location off in the camera app, before the trip, removes the problem instead of correcting it. It is the one setting that does not depend on remembering something later that evening.

Do social platforms strip EXIF for me?

Some do, sometimes, and few of them say so. Two platforms document their behaviour in writing.

Google Photos. Other than partner sharing, new albums, links and conversations you share do not include location details by default, and you can choose to include them. Locations that Google estimates are never shared at all.

Flickr. You can hide metadata from view. Its help page states that photos downloaded from your own account or its export retain metadata present at upload. Hiding the display therefore does not prove that the file is clean. Check the copy you intend to share.

On other platforms, inspect the shared file. Do not treat behaviour observed in one version as a permanent guarantee for every format and upload method.

One rule follows from all of it: strip the metadata yourself, before you upload, then check the file you are about to send.

Is stripping EXIF enough to protect a place?

No, and this is the part most tutorials skip. A file with no metadata is still an image, and an image says things.

France’s data protection regulator, the CNIL, put it plainly in a page on cross-referencing published information, dated 6 February 2024: a photo can be located and dated from the elements visible in it. The mechanism it describes applies here word for word. Public details that mean nothing on their own, lined up together, point to an identity, an address, a place.

What stays readable in a photo with no EXIF:

  • a recognisable facade, roof structure, bell tower or factory chimney;
  • a sign, a street plate, a house number, a company name, a number plate;
  • a ridgeline, a horizon, a pylon, a water tower in the background;
  • and everything your caption, your tags and your posting time hand over for free.

Three habits beat any tool: do not name the place, do not post on the way home, and look at the background before you publish rather than at the subject.

Before sharing a photo on Urbex Legends

Before uploading, remove sensitive metadata, including GPS location. Then check the metadata in the copy you intend to share; do not rely on hiding it from view alone.

Keep the credits and licence information needed for authorised reuse separately. Removing location data does not remove obligations relating to rights in the photo.

Repeat the check after changing tools, exporting or updating your sharing workflow.

Where you can inspect the copy actually shared, check that copy too. A successful upload does not establish that sensitive metadata is absent.

Public pages viewed without signing in do not provide exact access information. Member features are available on the website and in the app, according to access rights. Location information does not authorise entry. Check access conditions with the owner or site manager.

What this guide does not do

It does not explain how to get into anywhere, and it does not explain how to trace a place from a photograph. It describes a public file format, what tools and platforms document about their own behaviour, and what this app does with your images.

The community code says the same thing in different words: no public sharing of coordinates, not on social media, not on online maps, not in video. A photo’s metadata is simply the quietest way to break that rule without meaning to.

Frequently asked questions

How do I know whether a photo contains GPS coordinates?
Inspect the fields shown in file properties and, where needed, use a metadata reader such as ExifTool. Check the exported or shared copy, not only the original. A partial view does not guarantee the absence of sensitive data.
Should I strip only the GPS tags or all the metadata?
GPS is not the only sensitive field. Check the other metadata groups recognised by your tool and the output copy. Keep credits and licences needed for authorised reuse separately.
Do social platforms strip the location for me?
Rules depend on the service and sharing method. Google Photos distinguishes sharing within its service from downloading an original. Flickr distinguishes hiding metadata from the file’s contents. Check the copy actually shared rather than assuming it has been cleaned.
Is hiding EXIF in my Flickr account enough?
No. Flickr can hide metadata from view. Its help page states that downloads from your own account or its export retain metadata present at upload. Inspect the copy to be shared.
Does stripping EXIF make a photo impossible to locate?
No. A recognisable facade, a sign, a street number, a nameplate or a skyline stays readable in the image. France’s data protection regulator makes the point that a photo can be located and dated from what appears in it. Stripping metadata closes one route, not every route.

Sources

Dates record source consultations documented during writing. Sources and legal texts can change; check their current version, particularly for a legal question.

  1. CIPA / JEITA — CIPA DC-008-Translation-2026, Exif Version 3.1 (publiée le 30 janvier 2026) — accessed
  2. Exiv2 — table des tags Exif, dont le GPS Info IFD (tag 0x8825) — accessed
  3. ExifTool (Phil Harvey) — documentation, option -all= et limites par format — accessed
  4. Apple — Guide de sécurité personnelle : gérer les métadonnées de lieu dans Photos — accessed
  5. Google Photos — How Google Photos protects your location data — accessed
  6. Google Photos — Understand, find and edit your photos’ locations — accessed
  7. Flickr Help Center — EXIF data FAQ (page mise à jour le 10 août 2026) — accessed
  8. Microsoft TechNet Magazine (archive du 1er août 2016) — Remove personal metadata from files — accessed
  9. CNIL — Recoupement d’informations en ligne : ce que vous publiez peut dévoiler votre vie privée (6 février 2024) — accessed
  10. Urbex Legends — Ethics, the community code — accessed

Read next on the site